Last updated: 
3 weeks 6 days ago
Blog Manager
One of Jisc’s activities is to monitor and, where possible, influence regulatory developments that affect us and our customer universities, colleges and schools as operators of large computer networks. Since Janet and its customer networks are classified by Ofcom as private networks, postings here are likely to concentrate on the regulation of those networks. Postings here are, to the best of our knowledge, accurate on the date they are made, but may well become out of date or unreliable at unpredictable times thereafter. Before taking action that may have legal consequences, you should talk to your own lawyers. NEW: To help navigate the many posts on the General Data Protection Regulation, I've classified them as most relevant to developing a GDPR compliance process, GDPR's effect on specific topics, or how the GDPR is being developed. Or you can just use my free GDPR project plan.

Group administrators:

House of Lords: Online Platforms

Wednesday, November 11, 2015 - 09:03

The European Commission have recently announced a consultation into online platforms. Last month the House of Lords EU Internal Market Sub-committee invited submissions of evidence to inform the UK's response.

Although the main focus of both consultations is competition issues, they do revisit the question of intermediary liability for third-party postings. At the moment EU law says that an intermediary - such as a website or social network - that makes available postings from third parties cannot be liable for any illegality that they are not aware of. Unfortunately the law is not clear whether simply alleging that a posting breaks the law is sufficient to remove that shield. As a result many hosts simply remove material as a matter of course when any complaint is received. That approach is less comfortable for universities and colleges, as it may conflict with their legal duty to promote free speech.

A couple of years ago, working with UCISA, we were able to get a new form of intermediary protection into UK defamation law. That allows an intermediary, if it wishes, to obtain a court ruling on the balance between the legal requirements, rather than having to make the choice itself. Our evidence to the Lords Committee cites that example and suggests that it would be helpful to include something similar, covering all forms of alleged illegality, in European law.

We also plan to make a similar response direct to the European Commission before the end of the year.