Last updated: 
3 weeks 6 days ago
Blog Manager
One of Jisc’s activities is to monitor and, where possible, influence regulatory developments that affect us and our customer universities, colleges and schools as operators of large computer networks. Since Janet and its customer networks are classified by Ofcom as private networks, postings here are likely to concentrate on the regulation of those networks. Postings here are, to the best of our knowledge, accurate on the date they are made, but may well become out of date or unreliable at unpredictable times thereafter. Before taking action that may have legal consequences, you should talk to your own lawyers. NEW: To help navigate the many posts on the General Data Protection Regulation, I've classified them as most relevant to developing a GDPR compliance process, GDPR's effect on specific topics, or how the GDPR is being developed. Or you can just use my free GDPR project plan.

Group administrators:

Defamation Act 2013: help for website operators

Friday, April 26, 2013 - 23:54

The passing of the Defamation Act 2013 this week removes a couple of areas of legal uncertainty if you run a website, blog, etc. and someone else posts an article or comment that may be defamatory. First, provided you aren’t acting maliciously, you don’t risk liability merely by moderating what is posted. Second, the Act tries to ensure that defamation claims are settled either between the author and the person allegedly defamed, or by the courts. Only if both of those approaches are impossible should the website operator have to make the legal assessment whether a post is, or is not, defamatory.

To benefit from the new law’s protection website operators will either have to insist that all contributors publish their names and contact details, or else follow a process that the law will define to allow the complainant to take action against the author. That hasn’t been published or debated yet but, as I mentioned at Networkshop, discussion in Parliament of an earlier draft seemed to indicate that although it would require some record-keeping, it shouldn’t be unreasonably onerous.

The law doesn’t affect the existing defences for website operators, so you can still decide to simply remove anything that is the subject of a complaint. But for universities and colleges, who have a legal duty to promote free speech by their members and guests, the new process, which should offer legal certainty, may be more attractive.

This new UK law only applies to defamation, not to other wrongs that authors may commit, and at the moment it’s not clear whether it will apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland. However the European Commission consulted last year on a general “notice and action” policy to address the same concerns about the position of website operators, so there should be something that applies more widely in the pipeline.